We look at what the two new most powerful men in Britain might do for the economy and public finances in office – and what they should do.
Article last updated 17 July 2026.
Against this backdrop, understanding risk not just expected outcomes has become central to delivering suitable advice. Monte Carlo simulation is increasingly playing a role in helping advisers meet this challenge by providing a more robust way to assess the sustainability of retirement plans in uncertain markets.
Moving beyond a single forecast
Traditional cashflow modelling typically relies on a central projection based on assumed average returns. While this can provide a useful starting point, it has clear limitations.
Investment markets are inherently unpredictable. Returns vary over time, and periods of volatility can have a disproportionate impact on client outcomes particularly once withdrawals begin. This is especially evident in sequence of returns risk, where poor market performance early in retirement can significantly reduce the longevity of a portfolio, even if long-term averages appear reasonable. In practice, this means that focusing on a single projected outcome may understate the range of risks clients face.
A probabilistic approach to planning
Monte Carlo simulation addresses this challenge by modelling uncertainty directly. Rather than relying on one assumed path, it runs thousands of possible market scenarios, each reflecting different combinations of returns, volatility and economic conditions. Each simulation represents a plausible version of the future from favourable market environments through to more adverse conditions allowing advisers to assess how a client’s plan performs across a wide range of outcomes. The result is not a single forecast, but a distribution of potential outcomes, offering a more complete understanding of risk.
From projections to resilience
One of the most valuable aspects of this approach is the shift in how outcomes are framed.
Instead of presenting a single end value, Monte Carlo modelling produces a probability of success the likelihood that a client’s plan will meet its objectives over the retirement horizon.
This reframes the conversation from:
- “What is likely to happen?” to:
- “How resilient is this plan in different scenarios?”
For advisers, this supports more meaningful discussions around:
- sustainability of withdrawals
- acceptable levels of risk
- trade-offs between income today and security over the long term
Reflecting the realities of retirement
The value of Monte Carlo modelling becomes particularly clear in the context of decumulation, where multiple risks interact over long time horizons.
These include:
- Market volatility, which affects portfolio values unpredictably
- Sequence of returns risk, particularly in early retirement
- Longevity risk, with retirements often spanning several decades
- Inflation, which can erode purchasing power over time
Taken together, these factors highlight that retirement planning is not a linear process, but one that requires ongoing assessment and adjustment.
A probabilistic framework helps advisers reflect this reality more effectively.
Supporting better client understanding
At a time when regulatory expectations are increasingly focused on client understanding and suitability, how outcomes are communicated is as important as the underlying analysis.
Monte Carlo modelling can play a valuable role by:
- Illustrating the range of possible outcomes, not just the central case
- Highlighting potential downside scenarios
- Demonstrating the impact of different planning decisions
This can help clients develop a clearer understanding of uncertainty and a more realistic view of what their retirement plan is designed to achieve.
As regulatory guidance has emphasised, modelling can support suitability where it enables clients to understand both the benefits and risks of different approaches.
Interpreting results with care
As with any modelling approach, outputs should be interpreted carefully.
A single success probability, while useful, does not capture the full picture. Advisers should also consider:
- when adverse outcomes occur
- the range and dispersion of results
- the severity of potential shortfalls
Equally, it is important to recognise that simulations are based on assumptions. They provide insight into possible outcomes, not certainty.
Professional judgement therefore remains central to the advice process.
A tool within a broader framework
Monte Carlo simulation is best viewed as one component of a well-governed retirement planning framework.
Used appropriately, it can:
- support more robust assessment of income sustainability
- help stress-test strategies across different conditions
- inform ongoing review and adjustment of plans
However, it is most effective when combined with:
- high-quality client data
- clearly defined objectives
- a disciplined investment approach
- ongoing adviser oversight
Conclusion: planning for uncertainty, not certainty
The nature of retirement advice has evolved. Today, it is less about identifying a single “right” answer, and more about navigating uncertainty in a structured and transparent way.
Monte Carlo simulation supports this shift by helping advisers:
- move beyond static projections
- assess the resilience of different strategies
- have more informed, balanced conversations with clients
It does not seek to predict the future. Rather, it provides a framework for understanding the range of outcomes that the future may hold and for building plans that are better equipped to withstand them.
