Green eating

Environmental impacts, health awareness and growing intolerances are rapidly changing people’s appetites. Our head of multi-asset investments, David Coombs, has been gluten-free since before the kids started doing it, so he believes he has some wisdom to share.

A plate with lettuce

Tracey and I were eating at our favourite local café Friday night, ordering the same main course. I tend to order first due to my coeliac need for gluten free which can complicate matters. (Better to strike while the service is fresh and sharp.) When Tracey ordered the waitress asked if she was normal. She quickly caught herself and said, “Perhaps I should rephrase that …”

I found this funny. Frankly, it happens all the time. It did make me think though: what is ‘normal’ in the food industry now? Aside from the rising tide of gluten-free people like me, you have the rapid take-up of vegan diets, carbon counters for each morsel, food miles and now labour shortages – both in restaurants and stores and in their supply chains … what a minefield.

We savoured our chicken burgers – gluten-free buns are no longer the dusty bricks of old! – while we still could, reminiscing over how we used to eat while growing up in the seventies when money was tight. Six types of vegetables on rotation, boiled to taste all the same. Arctic roll, Findus pancakes, meat well done (sorry, very well done) and fish paste. Our mothers did a fine job, but they were so limited in choice.

Now of course choice is phenomenal: vegetables flown from all corners of the globe, strawberries at Christmas and ready meals that taste amazing thanks to sugar and other stuff we’d rather not think about. We even have the 21st century equivalent of the Findus debacle, the Greggs vegan sausage roll that managed to be just as unhealthy as the meat version.

Fragmenting diets

From an investment point of view, there has been much excitement about the next big thing in food, alternative milk and meat, organically grown, plant-based, dairy-free, you name it. What do I take from all this? It’s clearly an industry ripe for disruption. From source through to manufacture and distribution. On top of that, more extreme and unpredictable weather patterns are a rising external risk factor to consider.

Disruption is generally polarising, as shown in sectors like retail. So, who will be the winners and losers in the food industry and how do we react as investors? I haven’t concluded yet, but I will share my musings.

I see this in two ways. I want to hedge our multi-asset funds against the risk of extreme weather, while also taking advantage of opportunities provided by the food manufacturing disruptors. Of course, we could get exposure to agricultural commodity prices, thereby benefiting if bad weather reduces harvests and sends prices higher. We do this already via our general commodity ETFs. But a specialised investment in agricultural commodities can be expensive, even if it does act as a hedge on food inflation. We could also buy food producers in the same way you can buy gold miners rather than bullion.

Let’s start with agriculture. It feels to me that the days of the small holding farmer are numbered. Clarkson’s Farm on Amazon is a great example of modern challenges, and his farm isn’t even that small. With ever more volatile weather, the need for more kit, technology and machinery is clear. Harvests need to be gathered more quickly and at short notice. You need access to capital to achieve scale and not every farmer can chair a quiz show on ITV.

Management of soil and livestock through carbon neutral and natural methods will be key to gaining the support of governments and consumers over the next decade. This means more scientific advances and falling prices. Sound familiar? So, companies that can provide pest protection without damaging ecosystems will be well rewarded. Meanwhile, agricultural machinery needs to electrify or find another alternative fuel system to the combustion engine. More technology will be needed, especially in automation and sensors that already help farmers achieve optimum yields. We are looking at all these areas and already own Trimble in our sustainable multi-asset funds.

Which is the greenest of them all?

Moving onto food production, the focus on healthier living, fewer food miles and alternative diets  all offer very exciting opportunities for disruptors. However, when you start digging it gets complicated real quick. Non-dairy milks that require huge amounts of water to make. Vegan foods that are highly processed and full of synthetic ingredients, so creating concerns around efficacy (and acceptance by customers) and even cloning. These are just a few of the many challenges to the new kids on the block whose environmental, social and governance (ESG) credentials aren’t as clear cut as their marketing would lead you to believe.

We want to invest in companies that provide food that is healthy, tasty, interesting and has a low carbon footprint. That’s a long and deeply challenging list, but I think companies that can crack it will dominate the industry over the coming couple of decades. Christian Hansen, a Danish food additive and enzymes supplier, is one company that we believe in. We own it in our multi-asset funds. We are looking for more like it.

Finally, there’s distribution. Food miles will, I believe, become a bigger issue as time goes on. Remainers need to get used to the Union Jack on food packaging. They can relax: it’s not about Brexit, but low miles. This shift to local supply creates huge opportunities for smaller companies in the UK as access to market improves. How will this land with supermarkets which are used to selling on volume and price? Are we at peak Lidl with German-made Glamorgan sausages? I just made that up, but the point is a serious one. We might see a change in the power imbalance between retailers and suppliers. It probably means higher prices, something that challenges our view that inflation will be a passing phase. We’re watching closely.

How will we buy food? Same-day delivery from Amazon Wholefoods, a chosen window from Ocado or the local butcher’s bike when he has the puff? Shopify is helping level the e-commerce playing field for smaller companies, which could also provide significant disruption to incumbent suppliers and retailers.

The last decade has seen technology upend retailers, energy markets, media, telecommunications and others. I think the food industry, from field all the way through to your doorstep, is in for a revolution, and that’s exciting. There will still be room for Arctic roll though.

Tune in to The Sharpe End — a multi-asset investing podcast from Rathbones. You can listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes monthly.

 

 

Important legal information

This area of the site is for professional advisers

Please read this page before proceeding, it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the distribution of this information. It is your responsibility to inform yourselves of and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction.

This section of the website is directed only at investment advisers and other financial intermediaries who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

The information provided in this site is directed at UK investment advisers only and must not be circulated to private clients or to the general public. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicit an offer to purchase any investments by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or in which a member of the Rathbone Group is not authorised to do so.

I confirm that I am an investment intermediary authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. I have read and understood the legal information and risk warnings below:

Important Information (Terms and Conditions)

The information contained on this site is believed to be accurate at the date of publication but no warranty of accuracy is given and the information is subject to change without notice. Any opinions or estimates included herein constitute a judgement as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Furthermore, no responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of any information contained within sites provided by third parties that may have links to or from our pages.

Rathbone Investment Management Limited ("RIM") is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered Office: Port of Liverpool Building, Pier Head, Liverpool L3 1NW. Registered in England No 01448919.

In accordance with regulations, all electronic communications and telephone calls between Rathbones and its clients are recorded and stored for a minimum period of six months.

The information provided in this site is directed at UK investors only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicit an offer to purchase any investments by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or in which a member of the Rathbone Group is not authorised to do so.

In particular, the information herein is not for distribution and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities in France and the United States of America to or for the benefit of United States persons (being resident in the United States of America or partnerships or corporations organised under the laws of the United States of America or any state, territory or possession thereof).

In order to comply with money laundering and other regulations, additional documentation for identification purposes may be required.

Rathbones shall have no liability for any data transmission errors such as data loss, damage or alteration of any kind including, but not limited to, any direct, indirect or consequential damage arising out of the use of services provided or referred to in this website.

Past performance should not be seen as an indication of future performance.

The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested, particularly if your client does not continue with the investment over the longer term.

Changes in the rate of exchange between currencies may cause the value of an investment to go up or down.

Interest rate fluctuations are likely to affect the capital value of investments within bond funds. When long term interest rates rise the capital value of units is likely to fall and vice versa. The effect will be more apparent on funds that invest significantly in long dated securities. The value of capital and income will fluctuate as interest rates and credit ratings of the issuing companies change.

Tax levels and reliefs are those currently applicable and may change and the value of any tax advantage will depend on individual circumstances.

Investing in emerging markets or small companies may be potentially volatile, as these investments are high risk.

The design, text and images are owned, except as expressly stated by members of the Rathbone Group. They may not be copied, transmitted, displayed, performed, distributed, licensed, altered, framed, stored or otherwise used in whole or in part or in any manner without the written consent of Rathbones except to the extent permitted and under the procedures specified in the copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended and then only with notices of Rathbones' rights.

Subscribe to the In the KNOW blog email

Archive