Yes, fund manager

Once the pandemic is in the rear view, the UK has the chance to remake itself, argues our Minister for Administrative Affairs, David Coombs. Or is he our head of multi-asset investments…

UK passports

One of my favourite comedies is Yes Prime Minister. It is nearly 40 years old but incredibly it never seems to date. I have seen every episode many times and seen the play in recent years. Last week I read the book, which is basically the script of the series.

As I was reading it the absurdity started to seem less and less notable. As Boris sent the ships to Jersey to ward off the French fishermen and some obscure French minister went the full ’Allo ’Allo, the book felt more like nonfiction.

We do live in strange times. Following the recent local elections, the SNP are again calling for a referendum on independence so Scotland can rejoin the EU. At the same time, in France Michel Barnier is calling for restrictions on free movement of people while Marine Le Pen would like to see ‘Frexit’.

What if Scotland left the UK and France asked to form an Anglo-Franc Union (AFU) with England, Wales and Northern Ireland after leaving the EU. Impossible? Would you bet your house on it?

Settled dust

It’s early days, and there are serious teething issues, but so far Brexit has not been the ‘cliff edge’ many predicted. I have always been quite constructive on the post-Brexit UK economy, which was somewhat unfashionable for a time. Indeed post-Brexit and pre-COVID-19 we had been running much larger exposures to the UK in our multi-asset portfolio funds than in previous years. It was the UK government’s mishandling of the early stages of the pandemic that pushed us to reappraise our position, not Brexit.

Now, a year later I feel it’s time to reimagine what the UK economy will look like once the pandemic is behind it. And I think it should look pretty good. So why am I so optimistic? Deregulation, wage growth and ‘levelling up’.

I have long believed that one of the main benefits of Brexit would be an opportunity to review regulations across a whole swathe of industries. That’s not to lay all the blame at the EU’s door, successive UK governments (and their quangos) have been only too pleased to set more rules. However, Brexit should be the catalyst to review and cut them, enabling businesses to better compete internationally. Clearly, this mustn’t be at the expense of the workforce or consumer, but I’m confident that a balance can be struck. In the age of social media, companies acting badly are soon called out in any event.

Your skills are important, not the colour of your passport

A new, more economically driven immigration policy based on skills rather than geography should enhance our country’s intellectual property and help improve innovation and productivity. An added benefit could be to push up wages for those ‘in the middle’. Minimum wage increases in recent years have been significantly ahead of inflation, while middle income wages have stagnated. The belief is that the immigration of non-skilled workers from Europe has been a factor in this. This is difficult to prove, but there does appear to have been a correlation. While economists state, quite rightly in my view, that immigration from the EU added to GDP growth, it must be said corporate executives probably benefited more than their employees.

Finally, this government has to find ways to meet its pact with the Red Wall. This is likely to be via infrastructure. Boris does like a bridge. There is no doubt that Northern England, as well as Scotland and Wales, would benefit from better rail and road infrastructure that would bring both primary and secondary economic benefits. It would create a more geographically flexible work force which should attract new employers to the regions.

Now if I am only partially right this should be positive for UK plc. There is a catch, however. Yes, it’s the ‘i’ word. I really wanted to do a blog without mentioning it. All of this could well raise inflation in the short term and that would bring higher interest rates and bond yields. Is that necessarily a bad thing? Savers would certainly feel it’s their turn, that the borrowers have had it good for long enough. It would also mean the end of zombie companies and the return of proper capitalism: the survival of the fittest, greater investment in businesses and housing, and better jobs.

Doesn’t sound so bad does it? There would be losers though and they might be very vocal. 2022 will not be boring. The UK, though, might be a union worth joining. “Yes...Prime Minister.”

Important legal information

This area of the site is for professional advisers

Please read this page before proceeding, it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the distribution of this information. It is your responsibility to inform yourselves of and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdiction.

This section of the website is directed only at investment advisers and other financial intermediaries who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

The information provided in this site is directed at UK investment advisers only and must not be circulated to private clients or to the general public. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicit an offer to purchase any investments by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or in which a member of the Rathbone Group is not authorised to do so.

I confirm that I am an investment intermediary authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. I have read and understood the legal information and risk warnings below:

Important Information (Terms and Conditions)

The information contained on this site is believed to be accurate at the date of publication but no warranty of accuracy is given and the information is subject to change without notice. Any opinions or estimates included herein constitute a judgement as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Furthermore, no responsibility is accepted for the accuracy of any information contained within sites provided by third parties that may have links to or from our pages.

Rathbone Investment Management Limited ("RIM") is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered Office: Port of Liverpool Building, Pier Head, Liverpool L3 1NW. Registered in England No 01448919.

In accordance with regulations, all electronic communications and telephone calls between Rathbones and its clients are recorded and stored for a minimum period of six months.

The information provided in this site is directed at UK investors only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicit an offer to purchase any investments by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or in which a member of the Rathbone Group is not authorised to do so.

In particular, the information herein is not for distribution and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities in France and the United States of America to or for the benefit of United States persons (being resident in the United States of America or partnerships or corporations organised under the laws of the United States of America or any state, territory or possession thereof).

In order to comply with money laundering and other regulations, additional documentation for identification purposes may be required.

Rathbones shall have no liability for any data transmission errors such as data loss, damage or alteration of any kind including, but not limited to, any direct, indirect or consequential damage arising out of the use of services provided or referred to in this website.

Past performance should not be seen as an indication of future performance.

The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested, particularly if your client does not continue with the investment over the longer term.

Changes in the rate of exchange between currencies may cause the value of an investment to go up or down.

Interest rate fluctuations are likely to affect the capital value of investments within bond funds. When long term interest rates rise the capital value of units is likely to fall and vice versa. The effect will be more apparent on funds that invest significantly in long dated securities. The value of capital and income will fluctuate as interest rates and credit ratings of the issuing companies change.

Tax levels and reliefs are those currently applicable and may change and the value of any tax advantage will depend on individual circumstances.

Investing in emerging markets or small companies may be potentially volatile, as these investments are high risk.

The design, text and images are owned, except as expressly stated by members of the Rathbone Group. They may not be copied, transmitted, displayed, performed, distributed, licensed, altered, framed, stored or otherwise used in whole or in part or in any manner without the written consent of Rathbones except to the extent permitted and under the procedures specified in the copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended and then only with notices of Rathbones' rights.

Subscribe to the In the KNOW blog email

Archive